top of page

🧫 Misidentification of Candida auris by Automated Systems – 2025 Update

ree

Published: July 2025 | By: FRCPathPrep.com Editorial Team

Essential update for FRCPath Medical Microbiology Part 2 candidates and practicing microbiologists


🔍 Overview

Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant emerging fungal pathogen with high transmission potential in healthcare settings. Unlike other Candida spp., C. auris has the ability to cause persistent colonisation, survive on surfaces for extended periods, and resist multiple antifungal classes.


Despite its clinical importance, C. auris remains difficult to identify accurately using many commercial diagnostic platforms. Misidentification can lead to inappropriate treatment, failure to isolate, and rapid nosocomial transmission.



❗ Why It Matters

  • C. auris can cause invasive candidiasis with high mortality (30–60%)

  • Often misidentified as other yeasts — delaying diagnosis

  • Frequently resistant to azoles, amphotericin B, and sometimes echinocandins

  • Requires reference lab confirmation in many settings

  • Mandatory notification and strict infection control are essential in the UK



⚠️ Common Misidentifications by Automated Systems

Here is a summary of how commonly used commercial identification systems may misidentify C. auris, especially if database libraries are outdated:

System

Common Misidentifications

VITEK 2 YST

Candida haemulonii, Candida duobushaemulonii

API 20C AUX

Rhodotorula glutinis (despite absence of red pigmentation), Candida sake

API ID 32C

Candida intermedia, Candida sake, Saccharomyces kluyveri

BD Phoenix Yeast ID

Candida haemulonii, Candida catenulata

MicroScan

Candida famata, Candida guilliermondii, Candida lusitaniae, Candida parapsilosis

RapID Yeast Plus

Candida parapsilosis

🔬 FRCPath Tip: If a Candida isolate shows resistance to fluconazole and is identified as a rare or unusual species, always consider C. auris — especially in ICU or outbreak settings.


🧪 Confirmatory Identification Methods

Method

Reliability for C. auris

Notes

MALDI-TOF MS

High — if database updated

Both Bruker and VITEK MS now include C. auris libraries

PCR / Real-time PCR

Very high

Available at reference labs

ITS sequencing

Gold standard

Not routinely available in all labs



🏥 Clinical Clues That Should Raise Suspicion

Scenario

Why It Matters

ICU or ventilated patient

High-risk population

Azole-resistant Candida from sterile site

Strong indicator

Repeated misidentification from same ward

Suggests outbreak

Yeast isolate with unusual profile

May be misidentified C. auris

Patient transferred from known outbreak area

Global risk (e.g., India, US, South Africa)



🔐 UKHSA Guidance (2025 Update)

UKHSA recommends the following actions if Candida auris is suspected:

  1. Send isolates to the UKHSA Mycology Reference Laboratory for confirmation

  2. Use MALDI-TOF if in-house and validated for C. auris

  3. Initiate isolation precautions immediately

  4. Screen contacts and the environment

  5. Inform local Infection Control and Public Health Teams



💊 Antifungal Resistance Patterns

Antifungal

Typical Resistance in C. auris

Fluconazole

>90% resistant

Amphotericin B

30–50% resistant

Echinocandins

Generally susceptible; resistance emerging

Flucytosine

Variable, not typically used


🧠 First-line treatment: Echinocandin (e.g., anidulafungin, caspofungin)❗ Monitor closely and refer to reference AST results; consider combination therapy in refractory or pan-resistant cases.



🧼 Infection Control Measures (UKHSA)

Action

When to Implement

Single-room isolation

Immediately if suspected

Chlorhexidine washes

Daily for colonised patients

Contact screening

Patients sharing healthcare environment

Terminal cleaning

Sodium hypochlorite or HPV (hydrogen peroxide vapour)

Environmental cultures

If outbreak suspected



📚 FRCPath Part 2 Exam Tips

  • Memorise key misidentification patterns (e.g., C. haemulonii → suspect auris)

  • Know when to escalate to reference lab

  • Be able to write a public health and infection control response in exam cases

  • Revise UKHSA C. auris guidance (2025) and international updates



🔗 References

  • UKHSA (2025). Candida auris: Laboratory Testing and Management in England

  • CDC (2024). C. auris Clinical Alert and Lab Guidance

  • EUCAST (2025). Antifungal MIC Distributions

  • Public Health England (Archived): C. auris Outbreak Management Toolkit


🧠 Final Thought

Candida auris poses a diagnostic and infection control challenge. Misidentification can be costly — not just for the patient, but for entire healthcare systems. FRCPath candidates and practicing microbiologists alike must be proactive in recognising, confirming, and reporting potential C. auris cases.


🎓 Want more high-yield fungal infection updates and OSPE-style questions?

👉 Sign up free at FRCPathPrep.com to access early MCQs, expert discussions, and guideline-based prep tools.

Comments


  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
© Copyright FRCPath PRep
bottom of page