🧫 Misidentification of Candida auris by Automated Systems – 2025 Update
- FRCPath Prep Medical Microbiology Consultants

- Jul 30
- 3 min read

Published: July 2025 | By: FRCPathPrep.com Editorial Team
Essential update for FRCPath Medical Microbiology Part 2 candidates and practicing microbiologists
🔍 Overview
Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant emerging fungal pathogen with high transmission potential in healthcare settings. Unlike other Candida spp., C. auris has the ability to cause persistent colonisation, survive on surfaces for extended periods, and resist multiple antifungal classes.
Despite its clinical importance, C. auris remains difficult to identify accurately using many commercial diagnostic platforms. Misidentification can lead to inappropriate treatment, failure to isolate, and rapid nosocomial transmission.
❗ Why It Matters
C. auris can cause invasive candidiasis with high mortality (30–60%)
Often misidentified as other yeasts — delaying diagnosis
Frequently resistant to azoles, amphotericin B, and sometimes echinocandins
Requires reference lab confirmation in many settings
Mandatory notification and strict infection control are essential in the UK
⚠️ Common Misidentifications by Automated Systems
Here is a summary of how commonly used commercial identification systems may misidentify C. auris, especially if database libraries are outdated:
System | Common Misidentifications |
VITEK 2 YST | Candida haemulonii, Candida duobushaemulonii |
API 20C AUX | Rhodotorula glutinis (despite absence of red pigmentation), Candida sake |
API ID 32C | Candida intermedia, Candida sake, Saccharomyces kluyveri |
BD Phoenix Yeast ID | Candida haemulonii, Candida catenulata |
MicroScan | Candida famata, Candida guilliermondii, Candida lusitaniae, Candida parapsilosis |
RapID Yeast Plus | Candida parapsilosis |
🔬 FRCPath Tip: If a Candida isolate shows resistance to fluconazole and is identified as a rare or unusual species, always consider C. auris — especially in ICU or outbreak settings.
🧪 Confirmatory Identification Methods
Method | Reliability for C. auris | Notes |
MALDI-TOF MS | High — if database updated | Both Bruker and VITEK MS now include C. auris libraries |
PCR / Real-time PCR | Very high | Available at reference labs |
ITS sequencing | Gold standard | Not routinely available in all labs |
🏥 Clinical Clues That Should Raise Suspicion
Scenario | Why It Matters |
ICU or ventilated patient | High-risk population |
Azole-resistant Candida from sterile site | Strong indicator |
Repeated misidentification from same ward | Suggests outbreak |
Yeast isolate with unusual profile | May be misidentified C. auris |
Patient transferred from known outbreak area | Global risk (e.g., India, US, South Africa) |
🔐 UKHSA Guidance (2025 Update)
UKHSA recommends the following actions if Candida auris is suspected:
Send isolates to the UKHSA Mycology Reference Laboratory for confirmation
Use MALDI-TOF if in-house and validated for C. auris
Initiate isolation precautions immediately
Screen contacts and the environment
Inform local Infection Control and Public Health Teams
💊 Antifungal Resistance Patterns
Antifungal | Typical Resistance in C. auris |
Fluconazole | >90% resistant |
Amphotericin B | 30–50% resistant |
Echinocandins | Generally susceptible; resistance emerging |
Flucytosine | Variable, not typically used |
🧠 First-line treatment: Echinocandin (e.g., anidulafungin, caspofungin)❗ Monitor closely and refer to reference AST results; consider combination therapy in refractory or pan-resistant cases.
🧼 Infection Control Measures (UKHSA)
Action | When to Implement |
Single-room isolation | Immediately if suspected |
Chlorhexidine washes | Daily for colonised patients |
Contact screening | Patients sharing healthcare environment |
Terminal cleaning | Sodium hypochlorite or HPV (hydrogen peroxide vapour) |
Environmental cultures | If outbreak suspected |
📚 FRCPath Part 2 Exam Tips
Memorise key misidentification patterns (e.g., C. haemulonii → suspect auris)
Know when to escalate to reference lab
Be able to write a public health and infection control response in exam cases
Revise UKHSA C. auris guidance (2025) and international updates
🔗 References
UKHSA (2025). Candida auris: Laboratory Testing and Management in England
CDC (2024). C. auris Clinical Alert and Lab Guidance
EUCAST (2025). Antifungal MIC Distributions
Public Health England (Archived): C. auris Outbreak Management Toolkit
🧠 Final Thought
Candida auris poses a diagnostic and infection control challenge. Misidentification can be costly — not just for the patient, but for entire healthcare systems. FRCPath candidates and practicing microbiologists alike must be proactive in recognising, confirming, and reporting potential C. auris cases.
🎓 Want more high-yield fungal infection updates and OSPE-style questions?
👉 Sign up free at FRCPathPrep.com to access early MCQs, expert discussions, and guideline-based prep tools.




Comments